ViBidLEQA_large
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Base Model | nguyenvulebinh/vi-mrc-large |
| Language | Vietnamese |
| License | MIT |
| Performance | 88.30% Exact Match, 94.25% F1-Score |
What is ViBidLEQA_large?
ViBidLEQA_large is a specialized Extractive Question-Answering (EQA) model designed specifically for Vietnamese bidding law. Built upon the vi-mrc-large architecture, this model has been fine-tuned using a carefully curated dataset of 5,300 training samples and validated by legal experts. The model demonstrates exceptional performance in extracting precise answers from legal documents related to Vietnamese bidding law queries.
Implementation Details
The model leverages the Transformers library and implements a robust question-answering pipeline. It processes input queries with a maximum context length of 512 tokens and has been trained on a dataset that combines automatically generated samples (validated by legal experts) with manually created test cases.
- Training dataset: 5,300 samples generated using Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- Test dataset: 1,000 manually verified samples
- Maximum input length: 512 tokens
- Implementation framework: PyTorch and Transformers
Core Capabilities
- Precise answer extraction from Vietnamese bidding law documents
- High accuracy with 88.30% Exact Match score
- Specialized legal domain understanding
- Efficient processing of legal queries
- Integration-ready for legal document analysis systems
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What makes this model unique?
The model's specialization in Vietnamese bidding law, combined with its high accuracy and expert-validated training data, makes it uniquely suited for legal document analysis. The combination of automated and manual data validation ensures both scale and quality in its training process.
Q: What are the recommended use cases?
The model is ideal for legal document analysis systems, bidding law information retrieval, legal advisory chatbots, and automated question-answering systems focused on Vietnamese bidding law. However, it should be used as a reference tool rather than a replacement for professional legal advice.
