Can LLMs Revolutionize Code Analysis?
An Empirical Study of Large Language Models for Type and Call Graph Analysis
By
Ashwin Prasad Shivarpatna Venkatesh|Rose Sunil|Samkutty Sabu|Amir M. Mir|Sofia Reis|Eric Bodden
https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00603v1
Summary
Imagine a world where machines could understand code as well as humans, effortlessly spotting bugs and optimizing performance before a single line runs. Large language models (LLMs), like those powering ChatGPT, are stepping into this very role, promising to revolutionize how we analyze code. Recent research explores the potential of LLMs in two key areas: type inference and call graph analysis. Type inference is like giving the computer the ability to deduce the data type of a variable (integer, string, etc.) without explicit instructions. Call graph analysis maps out the relationships between different functions in a program, revealing how code flows and interacts. To test their effectiveness, researchers put 24 LLMs through their paces with specially crafted Python and JavaScript benchmarks. The results reveal an interesting dynamic: LLMs excel at type inference, outperforming traditional tools, but struggle with the complexity of call graph analysis, where static analysis techniques still reign supreme. The challenge for LLMs in call graph analysis lies in the intricate relationships and flow of code execution. Traditional static analysis tools, which methodically trace every step of a program without actually running it, prove more adept at this task. However, the story is reversed for type inference. Here, LLMs shine, leveraging their vast knowledge base to deduce types accurately and efficiently. What does this mean for the future? The research suggests a hybrid approach, combining the strengths of LLMs and traditional tools. LLMs could take on the faster type inference, providing richer context for static analysis tools to refine their call graph constructions. This synergistic approach could lead to faster, more reliable, and automated code analysis workflows. While the research paints a promising picture, challenges remain. The computational demands of large LLMs hinder their use in resource-constrained environments, and their grasp of dynamic language features, especially in JavaScript, needs to improve. Nonetheless, this research lays a foundation for the future of AI-powered code analysis, suggesting that LLMs, properly integrated, can revolutionize software development.
🍰 Interesting in building your own agents?
PromptLayer provides the tools to manage and monitor prompts with your whole team.
Get started for free.Question & Answers
How do LLMs perform type inference in code analysis compared to traditional tools?
LLMs excel at type inference by leveraging their vast knowledge base to deduce variable types without explicit declarations. The process involves analyzing code context, variable usage patterns, and common programming conventions to determine appropriate data types. For example, when examining a variable storing numeric calculations, LLMs can infer it's likely an integer or float based on operations performed. In practical applications, this could help developers catch type-related bugs early and improve code maintainability by automatically documenting implicit types. Research shows LLMs outperform traditional type inference tools in accuracy and efficiency, making them particularly valuable for dynamically typed languages like Python and JavaScript.
What are the main benefits of AI-powered code analysis for software development?
AI-powered code analysis offers several key advantages for software development. It can automatically detect bugs and potential issues before code execution, saving developers significant debugging time. The technology also helps improve code quality by suggesting optimizations and maintaining consistent coding standards across projects. For businesses, this means faster development cycles, reduced maintenance costs, and higher-quality software products. Common applications include automated code reviews, performance optimization, and security vulnerability detection. While not perfect, AI-powered analysis tools are becoming increasingly valuable for both individual developers and large development teams.
How can automated code analysis tools improve workplace productivity?
Automated code analysis tools significantly boost workplace productivity by streamlining the development process. They perform rapid code reviews, identify potential issues early in development, and suggest improvements automatically. This reduces the time spent on manual code review and debugging, allowing developers to focus on more creative and strategic tasks. For organizations, this means faster project delivery, better resource allocation, and reduced development costs. Whether you're a small startup or large enterprise, these tools can help maintain code quality while accelerating development cycles. The combination of AI and traditional analysis methods provides a comprehensive approach to code quality assurance.
.png)
PromptLayer Features
- Testing & Evaluation
- The paper's systematic evaluation of multiple LLMs for code analysis tasks aligns with PromptLayer's testing capabilities
Implementation Details
Set up batch tests comparing LLM responses against known type inference examples, implement scoring metrics for accuracy, and create regression tests for consistent performance
Key Benefits
• Systematic comparison of LLM performance across different code analysis tasks
• Reproducible evaluation framework for type inference accuracy
• Automated regression testing to maintain quality
Potential Improvements
• Add specialized metrics for code analysis accuracy
• Implement parallel testing for multiple LLMs
• Create code-specific evaluation templates
Business Value
.svg)
Efficiency Gains
Reduces manual testing time by 70% through automated batch testing
.svg)
Cost Savings
Optimizes LLM usage by identifying most cost-effective models for specific tasks
.svg)
Quality Improvement
Ensures consistent code analysis quality through standardized testing
- Analytics
- Workflow Management
- The proposed hybrid approach combining LLMs and traditional tools requires sophisticated workflow orchestration
Implementation Details
Create multi-step workflows that coordinate LLM-based type inference with traditional static analysis tools, including version tracking and result aggregation
Key Benefits
• Seamless integration of multiple analysis tools
• Version-controlled workflows for reproducibility
• Flexible template system for different code analysis scenarios
Potential Improvements
• Add dynamic workflow adjustment based on code complexity
• Implement parallel processing for large codebases
• Create specialized templates for different programming languages
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Reduces analysis pipeline setup time by 60% through reusable templates
Cost Savings
Optimizes resource allocation between LLM and traditional tools
Quality Improvement
Ensures consistent analysis quality through standardized workflows
.svg)
