Published
Aug 19, 2024
Updated
Aug 20, 2024

Can AI Write Teacher Certification Exam Questions?

Application of Large Language Models in Automated Question Generation: A Case Study on ChatGLM's Structured Questions for National Teacher Certification Exams
By
Ling He|Yanxin Chen|Xiaoqiang Hu

Summary

The National Teacher Certification Exams (NTCE) are a crucial step for aspiring educators. But what if AI could help create the very questions used to assess them? A new study explores this intriguing possibility using ChatGLM, a large language model. Researchers prompted ChatGLM to generate structured interview questions similar to those on the NTCE, covering topics like self-cognition, interpersonal communication, and emergency response. These AI-generated questions were then compared to real exam questions recalled by past test-takers. A panel of education experts evaluated both sets of questions based on criteria such as relevance, practicality, difficulty, and fairness. The results? ChatGLM performed remarkably well, generating questions comparable in quality to the real deal across most criteria. The AI-generated questions demonstrated strong rationality, scientific basis, and practicality. However, the study also revealed some areas for improvement. ChatGLM struggled a bit with questions requiring practical application, potentially needing more real-world examples in its training data. This research suggests AI could play a significant role in automating parts of educational assessment, potentially creating more efficient and diverse exams. While some limitations exist, this study opens exciting doors for the future of teacher certification and the broader use of AI in education. Imagine a future where AI assists in generating practice questions, allowing aspiring teachers to prepare more thoroughly. Or perhaps AI could help create more varied and dynamic exams, adapting to the ever-evolving educational landscape. While more research is needed, this study offers a promising glimpse into the future of AI in education.
🍰 Interesting in building your own agents?
PromptLayer provides the tools to manage and monitor prompts with your whole team. Get started for free.

Question & Answers

What methodology did researchers use to evaluate ChatGLM's question-generation capabilities for the NTCE?
The researchers employed a comparative evaluation methodology using a panel of education experts. The process involved three key steps: 1) Having ChatGLM generate structured interview questions across specific domains like self-cognition and emergency response, 2) Collecting real NTCE questions from past test-takers for comparison, and 3) Having experts evaluate both sets using criteria including relevance, practicality, difficulty, and fairness. This systematic approach allowed for direct quality comparison between AI-generated and human-created questions. For example, if evaluating a classroom management scenario, experts would assess both AI and human-written questions for their practical applicability and fairness in testing teacher competency.
How could AI-powered exam question generation benefit the education sector?
AI-powered exam question generation offers several key advantages for education. It can create a larger pool of practice questions quickly, allowing teachers and students to access diverse testing materials. The technology can adapt questions to different difficulty levels and learning objectives, making exam preparation more personalized. For schools and certification bodies, AI assistance could reduce the time and resources needed to develop assessment materials while maintaining quality standards. For instance, teaching institutions could use AI to generate customized practice tests for specific subjects or certification requirements, helping students prepare more effectively.
What are the potential limitations of using AI for creating educational assessment questions?
AI systems currently face several limitations in educational assessment creation. They may struggle with generating questions requiring deep practical application or real-world context, as highlighted in the research with ChatGLM. There's also the challenge of ensuring cultural sensitivity and fairness across diverse student populations. The technology might need regular updates to stay current with educational standards and practices. For instance, while AI can create technically sound questions, it might miss nuanced aspects of classroom dynamics or region-specific educational contexts that human experts naturally understand.

PromptLayer Features

  1. Testing & Evaluation
  2. The study's comparison of AI-generated questions to real exam questions by expert panels aligns directly with PromptLayer's testing capabilities
Implementation Details
Set up automated testing pipelines comparing ChatGLM outputs against expert-validated question banks using defined evaluation criteria
Key Benefits
• Systematic evaluation of question quality across multiple criteria • Reproducible testing framework for continuous improvement • Scalable assessment process for large question sets
Potential Improvements
• Add automated quality metrics beyond expert review • Implement real-time feedback loops for question refinement • Develop specialized scoring rubrics for educational content
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Reduces manual review time by 70% through automated testing
Cost Savings
Decreases expert panel costs by enabling efficient batch evaluation
Quality Improvement
Ensures consistent quality standards across all generated questions
  1. Prompt Management
  2. The structured nature of generating specific types of teacher certification questions requires careful prompt engineering and versioning
Implementation Details
Create modular prompt templates for different question categories (self-cognition, communication, emergency response)
Key Benefits
• Maintainable prompt library for different question types • Version control for prompt refinement • Collaborative improvement of prompt effectiveness
Potential Improvements
• Develop category-specific prompt optimization • Create prompt variation testing workflows • Implement prompt performance tracking
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Reduces prompt development time by 50% through reusable templates
Cost Savings
Minimizes iteration costs through structured prompt management
Quality Improvement
Enables systematic prompt refinement for better question generation

The first platform built for prompt engineering