Published
Jun 20, 2024
Updated
Jun 21, 2024

Are LLMs Really Good at Creating Synthetic Tables?

Are LLMs Naturally Good at Synthetic Tabular Data Generation?
By
Shengzhe Xu|Cho-Ting Lee|Mandar Sharma|Raquib Bin Yousuf|Nikhil Muralidhar|Naren Ramakrishnan

Summary

Large language models (LLMs) excel at generating text and images, but how about tabular data, the workhorse of business and science? New research reveals that LLMs, whether used directly or fine-tuned conventionally, fall short as synthetic table generators. The problem lies in their autoregressive nature, which clashes with the need to model functional dependencies (how columns relate to each other). Imagine generating location data for US states. An LLM might learn Delaware's latitude and longitude individually, but struggle to keep them within state boundaries. This issue becomes amplified when dealing with all states, as capturing these location constraints across multiple states becomes even trickier. The research introduces Permutation-aided Fine-tuning (PAFT), a clever solution that makes LLMs "permutation-aware." PAFT injects knowledge of column relationships into the LLM's training process. This knowledge is derived from "functional dependencies," which specify how certain attributes determine others (like state determining the range of valid latitudes and longitudes). By understanding these dependencies, PAFT guides the LLM to generate data that respects real-world constraints, yielding significantly more accurate and useful synthetic tables. Beyond just improving accuracy, PAFT also makes the generation process more stable and faster. The results highlight that evaluating synthetic data solely on individual column distributions or simple correlations can be misleading. A more holistic approach, like checking for violations of known rules (like state boundaries), offers a better gauge of quality. This research opens exciting avenues for future work: exploring richer tabular constraints, refining LLM architecture for better order handling, and scaling these methods for larger datasets. The ability to generate high-quality synthetic tabular data has important implications for protecting sensitive information, augmenting limited datasets for training machine learning models, and supporting research in data-scarce domains.
🍰 Interesting in building your own agents?
PromptLayer provides the tools to manage and monitor prompts with your whole team. Get started for free.

Question & Answers

How does PAFT (Permutation-aided Fine-tuning) work to improve synthetic table generation in LLMs?
PAFT enhances LLMs by explicitly incorporating knowledge of column relationships during the fine-tuning process. The technique works by first identifying functional dependencies between columns (e.g., how a state determines valid latitude/longitude ranges), then training the model to respect these relationships regardless of column order. For example, when generating geographic data, PAFT ensures that if 'Delaware' is generated as a state, the corresponding latitude and longitude values will fall within Delaware's actual boundaries. This makes the synthetic data generation more accurate and consistent with real-world constraints, while also improving generation speed and stability.
What are synthetic tables and why are they important for businesses?
Synthetic tables are artificially generated datasets that mimic real data while maintaining privacy and security. They're crucial for businesses because they allow testing, development, and training of AI models without exposing sensitive customer information. For example, a healthcare company could use synthetic patient data for developing new diagnostic tools, or a financial institution could test fraud detection systems without risking real customer data. Benefits include regulatory compliance, cost reduction in data acquisition, and the ability to generate larger datasets for testing edge cases. They're particularly valuable in industries with strict data privacy requirements.
What are the main challenges in generating high-quality synthetic data?
The primary challenges in generating synthetic data involve maintaining accuracy while preserving relationships between different data points. This includes ensuring that generated data follows real-world rules and patterns, like keeping geographic coordinates within valid ranges or maintaining logical relationships between demographic variables. The data must also be diverse enough to be useful while avoiding biases present in original datasets. Common hurdles include maintaining data privacy, ensuring statistical similarity to real data, and creating enough variety to be useful for training AI models. These challenges are particularly important in regulated industries like healthcare and finance.

PromptLayer Features

  1. Testing & Evaluation
  2. The paper emphasizes the need for holistic evaluation of synthetic data quality, particularly checking for violations of known rules and constraints
Implementation Details
Create automated test suites that validate generated tabular data against predefined rules, functional dependencies, and statistical distributions
Key Benefits
• Systematic validation of generated table quality • Early detection of constraint violations • Reproducible quality assessment across different models
Potential Improvements
• Integration with domain-specific validation rules • Advanced statistical testing capabilities • Real-time quality monitoring dashboards
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Reduces manual validation effort by automating constraint checking
Cost Savings
Prevents costly errors by catching invalid data generation early
Quality Improvement
Ensures consistent data quality across all generated synthetic tables
  1. Workflow Management
  2. PAFT requires specific training processes and column relationship handling that benefit from structured workflow management
Implementation Details
Design reusable templates for PAFT training workflows with configurable functional dependencies and column relationships
Key Benefits
• Standardized PAFT implementation process • Versioned training workflows • Reproducible synthetic data generation
Potential Improvements
• Dynamic workflow adaptation based on data characteristics • Enhanced dependency configuration interface • Automated workflow optimization
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Streamlines implementation of complex PAFT processes
Cost Savings
Reduces training iteration costs through reusable workflows
Quality Improvement
Ensures consistent application of PAFT methodology across projects

The first platform built for prompt engineering