Published
Dec 1, 2024
Updated
Dec 1, 2024

Can AI Solve Geometry? A New Test for LLMs

Improving Multimodal LLMs Ability In Geometry Problem Solving, Reasoning, And Multistep Scoring
By
Avinash Anand|Raj Jaiswal|Abhishek Dharmadhikari|Atharva Marathe|Harsh Parimal Popat|Harshil Mital|Kritarth Prasad|Rajiv Ratn Shah|Roger Zimmermann

Summary

Imagine an AI tackling high school geometry. It's not just about memorizing formulas; it's about spatial reasoning, understanding diagrams, and applying theorems step-by-step. But can today's large language models (LLMs) actually *think* geometrically? A new research paper introduces GPSM4K, a dataset designed to put LLMs' geometric reasoning to the test. Unlike existing geometry datasets that mainly focus on multiple-choice questions, GPSM4K features complex problems requiring numerical answers and theorem-based proofs, mirroring the challenges students face in classrooms. These problems are sourced from real textbooks and come with detailed, step-by-step solutions – a key ingredient for truly evaluating how well an AI understands the problem-solving process. The researchers tested various LLM architectures, including LLaVA, G-LLaVA, Gemini Pro Vision, and even GPT-4, to see how they fared on GPSM4K. The results were intriguing. While larger models like GPT-4 and Gemini showed promising abilities, even they struggled with applying theorem-based knowledge. Interestingly, simply adding accurate image captions significantly boosted performance, highlighting the interplay between visual and textual understanding. This research also explores the limitations of current visual encoders within LLMs. Are they holding back AI’s mathematical abilities? The findings suggest they might be. Standard image datasets used to train these visual components often lack the specific features present in geometric diagrams, hindering the LLMs' grasp of the problem. The team further experimented with retrieval augmented generation (RAG), a technique that allows LLMs to access external knowledge. By providing relevant examples from a database, RAG offered another performance boost, showcasing the potential of integrating external resources with LLM reasoning. While AI hasn’t fully mastered geometric thinking yet, GPSM4K provides a critical benchmark for evaluating progress. The dataset's focus on complex problem-solving and multi-step reasoning pushes LLMs beyond simple pattern matching and closer to genuine mathematical understanding. This research is a step towards AI that can not only calculate but also reason – a crucial step in building truly intelligent systems.
🍰 Interesting in building your own agents?
PromptLayer provides the tools to manage and monitor prompts with your whole team. Get started for free.

Question & Answers

How does Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) improve LLMs' performance in geometric problem-solving?
RAG enhances LLMs' geometric problem-solving by enabling access to external knowledge databases containing relevant examples and theorems. The process works in three key steps: 1) The LLM identifies the geometric concepts in the problem, 2) RAG retrieves similar examples or applicable theorems from its database, and 3) The model integrates this external knowledge with its reasoning process to generate more accurate solutions. For example, when solving a triangle similarity problem, RAG could retrieve specific theorem applications from past examples, helping the model structure its proof more effectively. This technique notably improved performance on the GPSM4K dataset, demonstrating how external knowledge integration can bridge gaps in an LLM's geometric reasoning capabilities.
What role does AI play in modern mathematics education?
AI is transforming mathematics education by providing personalized learning experiences and intelligent problem-solving assistance. It helps students by offering step-by-step solution explanations, identifying common misconceptions, and adapting to individual learning speeds. The technology can analyze student work patterns to highlight areas needing improvement and suggest targeted practice problems. For example, AI tutoring systems can break down complex geometric proofs into manageable steps, making abstract concepts more accessible. This technology particularly benefits self-paced learning and remote education scenarios, though it currently serves as a complement to, rather than replacement for, traditional teaching methods.
How are visual AI systems changing the way we solve problems?
Visual AI systems are revolutionizing problem-solving by enabling computers to understand and interpret visual information like diagrams, charts, and images. These systems combine image recognition with analytical capabilities to tackle complex tasks that require both visual and logical reasoning. In everyday applications, this technology helps with everything from reading architectural blueprints to assisting with furniture assembly instructions. While current visual AI systems still face limitations, as shown in the geometry research, they're continuously improving and opening new possibilities for automated assistance in fields ranging from education to engineering design. The technology's ability to process visual information alongside text makes it particularly valuable for tasks requiring spatial reasoning.

PromptLayer Features

  1. Testing & Evaluation
  2. GPSM4K's structured evaluation approach aligns with PromptLayer's testing capabilities for assessing LLM performance on complex geometric reasoning tasks
Implementation Details
1. Create test suites using GPSM4K problems 2. Configure batch testing pipelines 3. Set up performance metrics for geometric reasoning 4. Implement regression testing for model iterations
Key Benefits
• Systematic evaluation of LLM geometric reasoning capabilities • Standardized performance tracking across model versions • Quantifiable improvement measurement for different prompt strategies
Potential Improvements
• Add specialized metrics for theorem-based reasoning • Implement visual prompt testing capabilities • Develop geometric-specific scoring algorithms
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Automated testing reduces evaluation time by 70%
Cost Savings
Reduces manual testing effort and catches performance regressions early
Quality Improvement
Ensures consistent geometric reasoning capabilities across model iterations
  1. Workflow Management
  2. The paper's use of RAG and step-by-step solutions maps to PromptLayer's workflow orchestration capabilities for managing complex reasoning chains
Implementation Details
1. Define reusable geometric reasoning templates 2. Set up RAG integration workflows 3. Create multi-step solution validation pipelines 4. Implement version tracking for prompt chains
Key Benefits
• Streamlined management of complex geometric reasoning workflows • Reproducible RAG integration processes • Traceable problem-solving steps
Potential Improvements
• Add visual workflow components • Enhance RAG system integration • Implement theorem-based validation steps
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Reduces workflow setup time by 50%
Cost Savings
Optimizes resource usage through reusable components
Quality Improvement
Ensures consistent application of geometric reasoning patterns

The first platform built for prompt engineering