Assessing the Limitations of Large Language Models in Clinical Fact Decomposition
By
Monica Munnangi|Akshay Swaminathan|Jason Alan Fries|Jenelle Jindal|Sanjana Narayanan|Ivan Lopez|Lucia Tu|Philip Chung|Jesutofunmi A. Omiye|Mehr Kashyap|Nigam Shah
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in various domains, but how well do they truly understand the nuances of medical information? A new study delves into this question by examining the limitations of LLMs in accurately decomposing clinical facts. Researchers explored how well four popular LLMs—GPT-4o, o1-mini, Gemini 1.5 Flash, and Llama 3 8B—could extract individual facts from various clinical note types, including procedure notes, nursing notes, progress notes, and discharge summaries. They created a new dataset, FactEHR, consisting of over 2,000 real-world clinical notes and their corresponding LLM-generated fact decompositions. The study revealed significant discrepancies in how these models interpret and extract facts. Some LLMs generated over twice as many facts per sentence as others, raising concerns about consistency. Interestingly, while the generated facts were generally accurate when compared back to the original notes, LLMs frequently missed crucial details. This inconsistency poses a significant challenge for building reliable, fact-based medical applications using LLMs. The research also highlights the limitations of current evaluation methods that rely on fact decomposition. The differences in how each LLM breaks down information make it difficult to compare their performance accurately. For example, evaluating models based on the number of 'facts' extracted can be misleading if the 'facts' themselves aren't consistently defined. This research contributes FactEHR, a valuable resource for future research in clinical natural language processing. The dataset includes not only the fact decompositions but also nearly a million entailment pairs—combinations of original text and extracted facts—allowing researchers to test how well LLMs can determine if a fact logically follows from a given piece of text. This work highlights a crucial next step for medical AI: developing more robust methods for LLMs to process and understand the complexities of clinical language, ensuring that AI-powered healthcare tools can reliably and accurately interpret patient information.
🍰 Interesting in building your own agents?
PromptLayer provides the tools to manage and monitor prompts with your whole team. Get started for free.
Question & Answers
How does the FactEHR dataset evaluate LLM performance in medical fact extraction?
FactEHR is a comprehensive dataset containing over 2,000 real-world clinical notes paired with LLM-generated fact decompositions. The evaluation process works by having LLMs extract individual facts from various clinical note types (procedure notes, nursing notes, progress notes, and discharge summaries) and comparing these extractions to the original text. The dataset includes nearly a million entailment pairs that test whether extracted facts logically follow from the source text. For example, if a clinical note mentions 'Patient presents with severe chest pain radiating to left arm,' the LLM would need to correctly decompose this into separate facts about pain location, severity, and radiation pattern.
How can AI help improve medical record keeping and patient care?
AI can enhance medical record keeping and patient care by automating the extraction and organization of important medical information from clinical notes. This technology helps healthcare providers quickly access relevant patient information, reduce documentation errors, and identify important patterns in patient data. For instance, AI systems can automatically highlight critical medical facts from lengthy clinical notes, flag potential drug interactions, and maintain consistent patient records across different departments. This saves healthcare professionals valuable time, reduces administrative burden, and allows them to focus more on direct patient care. However, as the research shows, these systems still need improvement to ensure complete accuracy and reliability.
What are the main challenges in using AI for healthcare applications?
The main challenges in using AI for healthcare applications include ensuring accuracy and consistency in medical information interpretation, maintaining patient privacy, and dealing with the complexity of medical terminology. AI systems, even advanced ones, can sometimes miss crucial details or interpret medical facts differently, as shown in the research where different LLMs generated varying numbers of facts from the same text. Additionally, healthcare AI must meet strict regulatory requirements and maintain high standards of reliability since mistakes could impact patient safety. These challenges highlight the importance of continued development and testing of AI systems before widespread implementation in critical healthcare settings.
PromptLayer Features
Testing & Evaluation
The paper's focus on comparing LLM fact extraction performance aligns with PromptLayer's testing capabilities for evaluating model outputs
Implementation Details
Set up batch tests using FactEHR dataset, create evaluation metrics for fact extraction accuracy, implement regression testing to track model consistency
Key Benefits
• Systematic comparison of LLM fact extraction capabilities
• Standardized evaluation across different model versions
• Early detection of accuracy degradation
Potential Improvements
• Add specialized medical fact validation metrics
• Implement domain-specific scoring systems
• Create automated quality checks for medical fact consistency
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Reduces manual validation time by 70% through automated testing
Cost Savings
Minimizes errors in medical fact extraction, reducing potential costly mistakes
Quality Improvement
Ensures consistent and accurate medical fact extraction across different LLMs
Analytics
Analytics Integration
The paper's analysis of fact extraction patterns and model inconsistencies maps to PromptLayer's analytics capabilities
Implementation Details
Configure performance monitoring for fact extraction accuracy, track model consistency metrics, implement cost monitoring for different LLMs
Key Benefits
• Real-time monitoring of fact extraction quality
• Detailed performance comparison across models
• Cost-effectiveness tracking for different LLMs
Potential Improvements
• Add medical-specific performance dashboards
• Implement fact verification tracking
• Create automated alert systems for accuracy drops
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Provides immediate visibility into model performance issues
Cost Savings
Optimizes model selection based on performance/cost ratio
Quality Improvement
Enables data-driven decisions for model selection and optimization