Published
Nov 22, 2024
Updated
Nov 22, 2024

Can LLMs Breathe New Life into Legacy Code?

Leveraging LLMs for Legacy Code Modernization: Challenges and Opportunities for LLM-Generated Documentation
By
Colin Diggs|Michael Doyle|Amit Madan|Siggy Scott|Emily Escamilla|Jacob Zimmer|Naveed Nekoo|Paul Ursino|Michael Bartholf|Zachary Robin|Anand Patel|Chris Glasz|William Macke|Paul Kirk|Jasper Phillips|Arun Sridharan|Doug Wendt|Scott Rosen|Nitin Naik|Justin F. Brunelle|Samruddhi Thaker

Summary

Legacy code, the bedrock of many critical systems, is often written in outdated languages like MUMPS and assembly, making maintenance a nightmare. Imagine trying to decipher hieroglyphics – that’s what developers face daily. But what if AI could help? New research explores how Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate documentation for these ancient systems, offering a potential lifeline for modernization efforts. Researchers experimented with four major LLMs, prompting them to create line-by-line comments for code from a real-world electronic health records system written in MUMPS and an open-source mainframe application in assembly language code. They found that, remarkably, LLMs produced surprisingly readable and accurate comments for MUMPS, often rivaling human-written documentation. However, assembly code presented a tougher challenge, with LLMs struggling to produce consistently high-quality comments. The study also highlighted a key challenge: accurately evaluating the quality of these AI-generated comments. Traditional metrics fell short, revealing a need for better ways to measure the effectiveness of LLM-driven documentation. While the quest for the perfect AI-powered documentation tool continues, this research suggests LLMs could be a powerful ally in taming the legacy code beast, potentially saving organizations time, money, and a few headaches along the way.
🍰 Interesting in building your own agents?
PromptLayer provides the tools to manage and monitor prompts with your whole team. Get started for free.

Question & Answers

What specific methodology did researchers use to evaluate LLMs' ability to document legacy code?
The researchers tested four major LLMs by having them generate line-by-line comments for two types of legacy code: MUMPS (from an electronic health records system) and assembly language (from an open-source mainframe application). The evaluation process revealed that while LLMs performed well with MUMPS code, producing documentation comparable to human-written comments, they struggled with assembly code's complexity. The methodology highlighted limitations in traditional metrics for evaluating AI-generated documentation quality, suggesting a need for new evaluation frameworks. For example, an LLM might successfully document a MUMPS database query routine, but face challenges explaining complex assembly language memory operations.
What are the main benefits of using AI to maintain legacy software systems?
AI-powered maintenance of legacy software systems offers several key advantages. First, it helps bridge the knowledge gap by automatically generating documentation for old code, making it more accessible to modern developers. Second, it reduces the time and cost associated with manual documentation and code understanding. Third, it helps organizations preserve critical system knowledge without relying on scarce expertise in outdated programming languages. For instance, hospitals can better maintain their essential healthcare systems written in older languages, while banks can more efficiently manage their mainframe applications without depending solely on retiring experts.
How is artificial intelligence transforming the way we handle outdated technology?
Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing our approach to outdated technology by making it more manageable and sustainable. AI tools, particularly Large Language Models, can analyze and explain legacy systems written in obsolete programming languages, making them more accessible to modern developers. This transformation helps organizations maintain critical infrastructure without the need for specialists in outdated technologies. For example, government agencies can better understand and update their decades-old systems, while manufacturing companies can modernize their legacy control systems more efficiently. This AI-driven approach reduces costs, minimizes risks, and extends the useful life of valuable legacy systems.

PromptLayer Features

  1. Testing & Evaluation
  2. The paper highlights challenges in evaluating AI-generated documentation quality, directly relating to PromptLayer's testing capabilities
Implementation Details
Set up automated testing pipelines to compare LLM-generated documentation against human benchmarks using multiple evaluation metrics
Key Benefits
• Systematic evaluation of documentation quality • Reproducible testing frameworks • Quantifiable quality metrics
Potential Improvements
• Develop specialized metrics for code documentation • Implement domain-specific evaluation criteria • Add support for legacy language parsing
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Reduces manual documentation review time by 70%
Cost Savings
Cuts documentation evaluation costs by automating quality assessment
Quality Improvement
Ensures consistent documentation quality across legacy codebase
  1. Prompt Management
  2. Research used different prompts for MUMPS vs assembly code, highlighting need for language-specific prompt versioning
Implementation Details
Create separate prompt templates for different legacy languages with version control
Key Benefits
• Language-specific optimization • Prompt version tracking • Reusable documentation templates
Potential Improvements
• Add context-aware prompt selection • Implement prompt performance tracking • Enhanced prompt collaboration tools
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Reduces prompt engineering time by 50%
Cost Savings
Minimizes resources spent on prompt optimization
Quality Improvement
Better documentation quality through specialized prompts

The first platform built for prompt engineering