Published
Dec 2, 2024
Updated
Dec 2, 2024

Can LLMs Master Strategy Games?

Mastering Board Games by External and Internal Planning with Language Models
By
John Schultz|Jakub Adamek|Matej Jusup|Marc Lanctot|Michael Kaisers|Sarah Perrin|Daniel Hennes|Jeremy Shar|Cannada Lewis|Anian Ruoss|Tom Zahavy|Petar Veličković|Laurel Prince|Satinder Singh|Eric Malmi|Nenad Tomašev

Summary

Large language models (LLMs) excel at various tasks, but strategic planning, like mastering a board game, remains a challenge. This research explores how LLMs can be trained for both external and internal planning to improve their strategic reasoning skills, using board games as a testing ground. Researchers introduced a novel Transformer model, the "multi action-value (MAV)" model, pre-trained on game data for chess, Chess960, Connect Four, and Hex. This model acts as a world model, value function, and policy function simultaneously, predicting the game state, legal moves, and win probabilities. Two planning approaches were tested: external and internal search. External search uses the MAV model to guide Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) without external game engines. This approach proved remarkably effective, even with a limited number of simulations, achieving Grandmaster-level performance in chess with a similar search budget to human players. Internal search distills the search process directly into the LLM by training it on linearized search trees. This approach allows the model to execute a search procedure within a single model call, showing performance improvements that scale with the search budget. Results showed significant improvements in gameplay across all tested games using both external and internal search methods. The MAV model demonstrated accurate state tracking and legal move prediction, minimizing hallucinations. External MCTS significantly boosted playing strength, even with low simulation counts. Internal search further enhanced performance by allowing the model to self-correct and explore multiple lines of reasoning. This research offers exciting insights into how search-based planning can enhance LLM reasoning abilities, suggesting potential applications in more complex real-world decision-making scenarios. However, the methods still rely on extensive game data and strong game engines for training, posing challenges for broader applications. Further research will explore more complex search procedures and integrate natural language communication capabilities into these specialized models, potentially paving the way for more versatile and powerful LLM agents.
🍰 Interesting in building your own agents?
PromptLayer provides the tools to manage and monitor prompts with your whole team. Get started for free.

Question & Answers

How does the MAV (Multi Action-Value) model combine world modeling, value function, and policy function in game playing?
The MAV model is a specialized Transformer that simultaneously handles three critical functions in game playing. Technically, it processes game data to predict the game state, evaluate legal moves, and calculate win probabilities in a single unified architecture. This works through: 1) State tracking to maintain an accurate game representation, 2) Move validation to ensure only legal moves are considered, and 3) Probability assessment to determine optimal moves. For example, in chess, the model would simultaneously track piece positions, validate possible moves, and evaluate which moves are most likely to lead to victory, similar to how a human player maintains game awareness while planning moves.
How is AI changing the way we approach strategic decision-making?
AI is revolutionizing strategic decision-making by combining data analysis with pattern recognition to suggest optimal choices. The technology helps break down complex problems into manageable components, evaluates multiple scenarios simultaneously, and identifies potential outcomes that humans might overlook. Benefits include faster decision-making, reduced human bias, and more consistent results across similar situations. This capability is valuable in various fields, from business planning and financial investments to healthcare diagnostics and urban planning, where multiple factors need to be considered simultaneously.
What are the key differences between external and internal AI planning systems?
External and internal AI planning systems represent different approaches to decision-making. External planning, like Monte Carlo Tree Search, explores multiple possibilities outside the main AI model, similar to consulting external experts before making a decision. Internal planning builds this exploration process directly into the AI model, like having an expert who can mentally simulate different scenarios. This distinction matters because internal planning can be faster and more efficient for quick decisions, while external planning might be more thorough for complex situations. These approaches are used in various applications, from game playing to business strategy and automated scheduling.

PromptLayer Features

  1. Testing & Evaluation
  2. The paper's systematic evaluation of model performance using different search methods aligns with PromptLayer's testing capabilities for measuring and comparing prompt effectiveness
Implementation Details
Set up A/B tests comparing different search strategies, implement batch testing across game scenarios, track performance metrics over time
Key Benefits
• Quantitative performance comparison across different approaches • Systematic evaluation of model improvements • Reproducible testing framework
Potential Improvements
• Integration with game-specific evaluation metrics • Automated regression testing for strategy quality • Custom scoring systems for strategic decision-making
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Reduces manual testing time by 70% through automated evaluation pipelines
Cost Savings
Optimizes model selection by identifying most effective approaches before full deployment
Quality Improvement
Ensures consistent strategy quality through systematic testing
  1. Workflow Management
  2. The paper's multi-step search processes and state tracking align with PromptLayer's workflow orchestration capabilities for complex prompt chains
Implementation Details
Create reusable templates for search procedures, implement version tracking for different search strategies, orchestrate multi-step reasoning chains
Key Benefits
• Structured management of complex reasoning flows • Version control for different search strategies • Reproducible experiment workflows
Potential Improvements
• Enhanced visualization of search trees • Dynamic workflow adaptation based on performance • Integration with external game engines
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Reduces setup time for new experiments by 50% through reusable templates
Cost Savings
Minimizes redundant computation through optimized workflow management
Quality Improvement
Ensures consistency in complex multi-step reasoning processes

The first platform built for prompt engineering