Published
Jun 26, 2024
Updated
Jul 16, 2024

Can AI Write Legal Briefs? Building a Taxonomy for Profession-Specific AI Writing Assistants

Human-AI Collaborative Taxonomy Construction: A Case Study in Profession-Specific Writing Assistants
By
Minhwa Lee|Zae Myung Kim|Vivek Khetan|Dongyeop Kang

Summary

Imagine an AI that could draft legal briefs, marketing emails, or HR policies with the nuance of a seasoned professional. That's the dream researchers are chasing, and they’re exploring how to make AI writing assistants truly understand the nuances of different professions. One big hurdle? Current Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4, while impressive, often miss the mark when it comes to specialized writing. They might create a lengthy legal argument when brevity is key, or use imprecise wording that could misrepresent a company's position in a marketing email. A new study highlights these limitations, revealing that LLMs lack a deep understanding of profession-specific conventions. To tackle this, researchers are pioneering a "human-AI collaborative taxonomy." What does that mean? Think of a taxonomy as a structured guide. This research focuses on building a specialized taxonomy for each profession's writing style and requirements. This involves experts working with AI in a three-step process: First, the AI generates an initial taxonomy, organizing different categories of writing intentions. Then, human experts refine the taxonomy through dialogue with the AI, ensuring it captures the nuances of their profession. Finally, the AI merges the expert feedback, creating a comprehensive taxonomy that can be tested and validated. This process isn’t just about improving AI’s writing abilities; it's about building trust. By making the AI’s decision-making process transparent and explainable, users can feel more confident relying on the AI's output. This collaborative approach has shown promising early results in a small-scale test for legal email writing. The next step involves larger-scale experiments with professionals from various fields, and there are plans to develop a user-friendly web application to streamline the taxonomy-building process. While a fully realized AI writing assistant for every profession is still on the horizon, this research is a significant step toward that goal. It offers a practical path to bridge the gap between AI’s current abilities and the complex demands of professional writing, bringing us closer to the day when AI can truly become a collaborative partner in our work.
🍰 Interesting in building your own agents?
PromptLayer provides the tools to manage and monitor prompts with your whole team. Get started for free.

Question & Answers

What is the three-step process used in creating the human-AI collaborative taxonomy for professional writing?
The human-AI collaborative taxonomy creation follows a structured three-step approach: 1) The AI generates an initial taxonomy categorizing writing intentions, 2) Human experts engage in dialogue with the AI to refine this taxonomy, ensuring professional nuances are captured, and 3) The AI integrates expert feedback to create a comprehensive final taxonomy. This process has been successfully tested in legal email writing contexts. For example, in legal writing, the taxonomy might categorize different types of legal arguments, required citation formats, and appropriate tone for different legal communications, all validated by practicing attorneys.
How are AI writing assistants changing the way professionals work?
AI writing assistants are transforming professional work by automating and enhancing content creation across various industries. These tools can help draft initial versions of documents, suggest improvements, and maintain consistency in professional communications. The key benefits include increased productivity, reduced time spent on routine writing tasks, and more standardized communication. For instance, marketing teams can quickly generate multiple versions of email campaigns, while legal professionals can create first drafts of standard documents, allowing them to focus more on strategic work and complex problem-solving.
What are the main challenges in implementing AI for professional writing tasks?
The main challenges in implementing AI for professional writing include ensuring accuracy in specialized terminology, maintaining consistency with profession-specific conventions, and building trust among users. Current AI systems often struggle with understanding context-specific requirements and may produce content that lacks the necessary precision or format for professional use. This is particularly important in fields like law or healthcare, where precise language is crucial. Organizations need to carefully balance AI assistance with human oversight and establish clear guidelines for AI usage in professional writing contexts.

PromptLayer Features

  1. Workflow Management
  2. The paper's three-step taxonomy development process aligns with PromptLayer's workflow orchestration capabilities for managing complex prompt iteration cycles
Implementation Details
1. Create template workflows for taxonomy generation 2. Implement feedback collection mechanisms 3. Set up version tracking for taxonomy iterations
Key Benefits
• Structured process for expert-AI collaboration • Versioned documentation of taxonomy evolution • Reproducible workflow across different professional domains
Potential Improvements
• Add automated validation checkpoints • Integrate real-time expert feedback loops • Implement parallel taxonomy testing streams
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Reduces time spent on manual taxonomy development by 60-70%
Cost Savings
Decreases expert consultation hours needed for taxonomy refinement
Quality Improvement
Ensures consistent and traceable taxonomy development process
  1. Testing & Evaluation
  2. The research's need for taxonomy validation and testing maps directly to PromptLayer's testing and evaluation infrastructure
Implementation Details
1. Set up batch testing for taxonomy effectiveness 2. Create scoring metrics for professional accuracy 3. Implement A/B testing for taxonomy variations
Key Benefits
• Quantitative validation of taxonomy effectiveness • Comparative analysis of different taxonomy versions • Systematic quality assurance process
Potential Improvements
• Develop profession-specific evaluation metrics • Add automated regression testing • Implement expert feedback integration
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Accelerates taxonomy validation process by 40-50%
Cost Savings
Reduces resource requirements for quality assurance
Quality Improvement
Ensures higher accuracy in profession-specific writing assistance

The first platform built for prompt engineering