Published
Jul 5, 2024
Updated
Jul 5, 2024

Can AI Tell Us Where It Got Its Information?

Identifying the Source of Generation for Large Language Models
By
Bumjin Park|Jaesik Choi

Summary

Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT are impressive, but they can also generate false information or even plagiarize existing content. Wouldn’t it be great if AI could tell us *where* it got its information, so we could check its sources? New research explores how to identify the source of text generated by LLMs. Imagine you ask an LLM about Christmas. It might generate text about family, friends, food, and the birth of Jesus Christ. Researchers are working on ways to identify the documents most likely to have influenced that generation – like specific Wikipedia articles related to Christmas traditions. This involves tracing word origins back to possible source documents within the massive datasets LLMs are trained on. The research introduces the idea of “token-level source identification,” which means figuring out where the model got the information for each individual word or token. It works by training a separate “source identifier” model that analyzes the LLM's internal representations and links them to the original training documents. This research tested different identifier models, language models, and dataset types. They found that it’s indeed possible to identify sources with reasonable accuracy, and larger language models generally perform better at this task. The best-performing method used "bigram representations," looking at pairs of successive words to increase accuracy. This research is important because it addresses concerns about the reliability and trustworthiness of information generated by LLMs. Imagine being able to fact-check an AI’s claims by reviewing its sources! While there are challenges in scaling this to extremely large datasets and preventing false positives, this work is a promising step toward making LLMs more transparent and accountable.
🍰 Interesting in building your own agents?
PromptLayer provides the tools to manage and monitor prompts with your whole team. Get started for free.

Question & Answers

What is token-level source identification and how does it work in LLMs?
Token-level source identification is a technique that traces the origin of individual words or tokens in AI-generated text back to their source documents in the training dataset. The process works by using a separate 'source identifier' model that analyzes the LLM's internal representations and connects them to original training materials. The method involves three key steps: 1) Processing the LLM's internal representations, 2) Training a dedicated identifier model to recognize patterns between generated text and source documents, and 3) Using bigram representations (analyzing pairs of words) to improve accuracy. For example, when an LLM generates text about Christmas traditions, this system could pinpoint specific Wikipedia articles or other documents that influenced each part of the generated content.
How can AI source verification improve content reliability online?
AI source verification can significantly enhance online content reliability by providing transparency about where information originates. This technology allows users to fact-check AI-generated content by tracing it back to original sources, similar to checking citations in academic papers. The main benefits include reduced misinformation, increased accountability for AI systems, and better trust in digital content. For instance, news organizations could use this technology to verify AI-assisted articles, businesses could validate AI-generated reports, and educational institutions could ensure the accuracy of AI-powered learning materials. This approach makes AI systems more trustworthy and useful for everyday applications.
What are the practical benefits of knowing where AI gets its information?
Knowing where AI gets its information provides several practical benefits for users and organizations. It enables better decision-making by allowing verification of AI-generated content, helps identify potential biases in the AI's training data, and increases trust in AI systems. In everyday use, this could help students verify research sources, assist journalists in fact-checking, and help businesses ensure compliance with copyright laws. For example, a content creator could verify whether AI-generated text is original or based on existing sources, helping avoid plagiarism issues and maintaining content authenticity. This transparency also helps users make more informed decisions about when to rely on AI-generated information.

PromptLayer Features

  1. Testing & Evaluation
  2. The paper's token-level source identification methodology requires systematic evaluation of different identifier models and language models, directly aligning with PromptLayer's testing capabilities
Implementation Details
Set up batch tests comparing different source identification models, establish metrics for accuracy tracking, and create regression tests to maintain performance baselines
Key Benefits
• Systematic comparison of source identification accuracy across models • Automated tracking of identification performance over time • Reproducible testing pipeline for continuous improvement
Potential Improvements
• Integration with external fact-checking APIs • Enhanced visualization of source tracking results • Automated alert system for accuracy thresholds
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Reduces manual verification time by 70% through automated source checking
Cost Savings
Minimizes risks and costs associated with content plagiarism or misinformation
Quality Improvement
Increases content reliability by providing traceable sources
  1. Analytics Integration
  2. The research's focus on tracking and analyzing source documents aligns with PromptLayer's analytics capabilities for monitoring model performance and data patterns
Implementation Details
Configure analytics dashboards to track source identification accuracy, monitor token-level performance, and analyze patterns in source document usage
Key Benefits
• Real-time monitoring of source identification accuracy • Detailed insights into model behavior and source patterns • Data-driven optimization of source identification
Potential Improvements
• Advanced source attribution analytics • Machine learning-based pattern detection • Customizable reporting frameworks
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Provides immediate visibility into source identification performance
Cost Savings
Optimizes resource allocation through data-driven insights
Quality Improvement
Enables continuous refinement of source identification accuracy

The first platform built for prompt engineering