Published
Jun 5, 2024
Updated
Jun 5, 2024

Can AI Rewrite Toxic Comments? A New Approach

LLM-based Rewriting of Inappropriate Argumentation using Reinforcement Learning from Machine Feedback
By
Timon Ziegenbein|Gabriella Skitalinskaya|Alireza Bayat Makou|Henning Wachsmuth

Summary

Online discussions can quickly turn toxic. But what if AI could help rewrite inappropriate comments, making the internet a more civil place? New research explores how to use reinforcement learning and large language models (LLMs) to automatically rephrase toxic arguments. The challenge is to rewrite offensive content while preserving the original meaning. Researchers experimented with different LLMs, including OPT, BLOOM, GPT-J, and LLaMA, using a combination of few-shot learning and instruction tuning. They found that prompting instruction-tuned LLMs, like LLaMA, yielded the most promising results. The system learns to balance appropriateness and meaning preservation using existing toxicity classifiers as feedback. Essentially, the LLM generates multiple rewrites, and the classifier helps select the best version—the one that's both less toxic and closest to the original intent. Human evaluations showed a preference for rewrites that prioritized appropriateness, even if some meaning was lost. While this research offers a fascinating glimpse into the future of online moderation, there are ethical considerations. Should platforms have the power to alter user-generated content? What about the author's intent? More research is needed, but this new approach could pave the way for a less toxic online experience.
🍰 Interesting in building your own agents?
PromptLayer provides the tools to manage and monitor prompts with your whole team. Get started for free.

Question & Answers

How does the AI system technically determine the best rewrite for toxic comments?
The system employs a dual-component approach combining LLMs and toxicity classifiers. The process works through these steps: First, the LLM (particularly instruction-tuned models like LLaMA) generates multiple potential rewrites of the toxic comment using few-shot learning techniques. Then, toxicity classifiers evaluate each rewrite on two metrics: appropriateness level and meaning preservation. The system selects the version that optimally balances both criteria, prioritizing reduced toxicity while maintaining the original message's core intent. For example, if someone wrote 'This is the stupidest idea ever!', the system might generate multiple alternatives and select 'I strongly disagree with this approach' as the optimal balance of civility and meaning preservation.
What are the potential benefits of AI-powered content moderation for online platforms?
AI-powered content moderation offers several key advantages for online platforms. It provides real-time, scalable monitoring of user content, helping maintain a healthier online environment while reducing the workload on human moderators. The technology can process massive amounts of content quickly, identifying and addressing toxic comments before they impact other users. For social media platforms, news sites, or community forums, this means faster response times to inappropriate content, better user experience, and potentially increased user engagement due to more civil discussions. Additionally, AI moderation can help reduce moderation costs while maintaining consistent standards across all content.
How might AI comment moderation change the future of online discussions?
AI comment moderation could fundamentally transform online discussions by creating more constructive digital spaces. Instead of simply removing toxic content, AI can help rephrase inappropriate comments into more civil alternatives, maintaining the core discussion while reducing negativity. This approach could lead to more productive online debates, increased participation from users who previously avoided commenting due to toxic environments, and better quality of discourse across social media, news sites, and forums. The technology could also help bridge different viewpoints by reformulating controversial statements in more neutral terms, fostering better understanding between users.

PromptLayer Features

  1. Testing & Evaluation
  2. The paper's approach of using toxicity classifiers to evaluate rewrites aligns with PromptLayer's testing capabilities
Implementation Details
Set up automated testing pipelines that compare original and rewritten content using toxicity metrics and semantic similarity scores
Key Benefits
• Systematic evaluation of rewrite quality • Reproducible testing across different models • Automated regression testing for model updates
Potential Improvements
• Integration with custom toxicity classifiers • Enhanced semantic preservation metrics • Real-time performance monitoring
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Reduces manual review time by 70% through automated testing
Cost Savings
Minimizes resources needed for quality assurance
Quality Improvement
Ensures consistent rewrite quality across different models and versions
  1. Workflow Management
  2. The multi-step process of generating and selecting rewrites maps to PromptLayer's workflow orchestration capabilities
Implementation Details
Create reusable templates for toxicity detection, rewriting, and evaluation steps
Key Benefits
• Streamlined rewrite pipeline management • Version tracking for prompt improvements • Reproducible workflow execution
Potential Improvements
• Dynamic prompt adjustment based on toxicity levels • Enhanced feedback loops for continuous improvement • Better handling of edge cases
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Reduces workflow setup time by 50%
Cost Savings
Optimizes resource usage through templated processes
Quality Improvement
Ensures consistent application of rewriting standards

The first platform built for prompt engineering