Published
Jul 28, 2024
Updated
Jul 28, 2024

Are LLMs Better at Political Sentiment Than Transformers?

Motamot: A Dataset for Revealing the Supremacy of Large Language Models over Transformer Models in Bengali Political Sentiment Analysis
By
Fatema Tuj Johora Faria|Mukaffi Bin Moin|Rabeya Islam Mumu|Md Mahabubul Alam Abir|Abrar Nawar Alfy|Mohammad Shafiul Alam

Summary

In the bustling digital landscape of Bangladeshi elections, understanding public sentiment is crucial. A new research paper explores how well AI models can analyze political sentiment in Bengali text. Researchers created a dataset called "Motamot," containing over 7,000 labeled examples of positive and negative sentiment from online news sources. They tested several pre-trained language models (PLMs), like BanglaBERT, and large language models (LLMs), such as Gemini 1.5 Pro and GPT-3.5 Turbo. While BanglaBERT achieved a respectable 88% accuracy, the LLMs stole the show. Gemini 1.5 Pro reached a stunning 96% accuracy, outperforming even GPT-3.5 Turbo. This suggests that LLMs excel at capturing subtle nuances in sentiment, especially with limited training data. The research also explores zero-shot and few-shot learning, revealing that providing a few examples helps improve accuracy significantly. This work opens doors for deeper analysis of political discourse, but challenges remain. Future research will explore more granular sentiment analysis, integrating different data types like images and videos, and making AI's decision-making process more transparent.
🍰 Interesting in building your own agents?
PromptLayer provides the tools to manage and monitor prompts with your whole team. Get started for free.

Question & Answers

How does zero-shot vs few-shot learning affect sentiment analysis accuracy in the Motamot dataset?
Zero-shot and few-shot learning showed distinct performance differences in sentiment analysis. Few-shot learning, where the model receives a small number of examples, demonstrated significantly better accuracy compared to zero-shot approaches. The process involves: 1) Zero-shot: Model attempts classification with no examples, relying purely on pre-trained knowledge, 2) Few-shot: Model receives 3-5 labeled examples before classification, improving contextual understanding. For instance, when analyzing a Bengali political statement, providing a few examples of positive and negative sentiments helps the model better recognize subtle cultural and linguistic nuances, leading to higher accuracy rates.
What are the real-world benefits of AI-powered sentiment analysis in politics?
AI-powered sentiment analysis in politics offers valuable insights for multiple stakeholders. It helps political campaigns understand public opinion in real-time, enables media organizations to gauge reaction to political events, and assists policymakers in measuring public response to initiatives. Key benefits include: rapid processing of vast amounts of social media and news content, detection of emerging trends or issues, and unbiased analysis of public sentiment. For example, during elections, it can help predict voter behavior, identify key concerns among different demographics, and guide campaign messaging strategies.
How are large language models (LLMs) changing the way we analyze public opinion?
Large language models are revolutionizing public opinion analysis by offering more accurate and nuanced understanding of human sentiment. They can process and analyze massive amounts of text data from social media, news articles, and public forums to extract meaningful insights. The key advantages include: better understanding of context and subtle meanings, ability to analyze multiple languages, and reduced bias compared to traditional polling methods. This technology helps businesses, politicians, and researchers better understand public sentiment on various issues, leading to more informed decision-making and targeted communications strategies.

PromptLayer Features

  1. Testing & Evaluation
  2. The paper's comparison of different models and learning approaches aligns with systematic prompt testing needs
Implementation Details
Set up A/B testing between different model prompts, implement batch testing across the dataset, track accuracy metrics over time
Key Benefits
• Systematic comparison of model performance • Automated accuracy tracking across different prompt versions • Reproducible evaluation pipeline
Potential Improvements
• Add support for non-English language testing • Implement custom accuracy metrics for political sentiment • Create specialized test suites for zero-shot vs few-shot scenarios
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Reduces manual testing effort by 70% through automation
Cost Savings
Optimizes model selection and prompt engineering costs
Quality Improvement
Ensures consistent performance across different scenarios
  1. Prompt Management
  2. The research's few-shot learning experiments require careful prompt versioning and template management
Implementation Details
Create versioned prompt templates for different few-shot scenarios, implement prompt version control, establish collaborative prompt development workflow
Key Benefits
• Structured management of few-shot examples • Version control for prompt iterations • Collaborative prompt optimization
Potential Improvements
• Add multilingual prompt support • Implement prompt performance tracking • Create template library for political sentiment analysis
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Reduces prompt development time by 50%
Cost Savings
Minimizes redundant prompt engineering efforts
Quality Improvement
Ensures consistent prompt quality across teams

The first platform built for prompt engineering