Published
Jun 21, 2024
Updated
Oct 28, 2024

Decoding Online Attitudes Towards Homelessness with AI

OATH-Frames: Characterizing Online Attitudes Towards Homelessness with LLM Assistants
By
Jaspreet Ranjit|Brihi Joshi|Rebecca Dorn|Laura Petry|Olga Koumoundouros|Jayne Bottarini|Peichen Liu|Eric Rice|Swabha Swayamdipta

Summary

Homelessness is a complex issue, often sparking conflicting emotions. How can we understand public attitudes towards homelessness on a broader scale? Researchers explored this question using the power of Large Language Models (LLMs) to analyze millions of Twitter posts. They developed "OATH-Frames"—a framework categorizing online discussions about homelessness into nine distinct attitudes, ranging from critiques of government policies to personal anecdotes about interactions with people experiencing homelessness. This innovative approach allowed researchers to analyze massive amounts of data with impressive speed, offering a 6.5x speedup in annotation time compared to manual analysis by experts. While LLMs like GPT-4 struggled with some of the nuances inherent in social media posts, combining them with expert validation proved to be a powerful combination. This LLM-assisted approach revealed hidden trends, like the correlation between a state's cost of living and the prevalence of government criticism, and how negative stereotypes about homelessness often slip past traditional sentiment analysis tools. By combining the scale of LLMs with human expertise, this research offers a valuable blueprint for understanding public discourse on challenging social issues, helping policymakers and advocacy groups better address the needs of the homeless population. Future research aims to incorporate additional context, like the target groups mentioned in posts and correlated factors such as mental health and substance use, to provide even richer insights into this complex issue.
🍰 Interesting in building your own agents?
PromptLayer provides the tools to manage and monitor prompts with your whole team. Get started for free.

Question & Answers

How did researchers use LLMs to analyze Twitter posts about homelessness, and what performance improvements did they achieve?
The researchers developed 'OATH-Frames,' a framework that used LLMs to categorize tweets into nine distinct attitude categories. The technical implementation achieved a 6.5x speedup in annotation time compared to manual expert analysis. The process involved: 1) Training LLMs to recognize specific attitude categories, 2) Processing millions of tweets through the trained model, and 3) Validating results with human experts. For example, the system could quickly identify patterns like correlations between state cost of living and government criticism, something that would take months to analyze manually.
How can AI help understand public opinion on social issues?
AI can analyze vast amounts of social media data to understand public sentiment and attitudes on social issues. The technology can process millions of posts quickly, identifying patterns and trends that would be impossible to detect manually. Benefits include faster analysis, broader coverage of public opinion, and the ability to track changes over time. For instance, organizations can use AI to monitor public reaction to policy changes, measure the effectiveness of awareness campaigns, or identify emerging concerns within communities. This helps policymakers and advocacy groups make more informed decisions based on real public sentiment.
What are the advantages of combining AI with human expertise in social research?
Combining AI with human expertise creates a powerful approach for social research by leveraging each component's strengths. AI provides rapid analysis of large datasets and identifies patterns, while human experts offer nuanced interpretation and validation of results. This hybrid approach ensures both efficiency and accuracy. For example, in studying social issues, AI can quickly process millions of social media posts, while experts can verify the findings and provide context-aware interpretations. This combination leads to more reliable research outcomes and better-informed policy decisions.

PromptLayer Features

  1. Testing & Evaluation
  2. The paper's validation approach combining LLM analysis with expert verification aligns with systematic prompt testing needs
Implementation Details
1. Create test sets of pre-validated social media posts 2. Configure A/B testing between different LLM prompt versions 3. Implement expert validation workflow 4. Track accuracy metrics across iterations
Key Benefits
• Systematic validation of LLM classifications • Quantifiable accuracy improvements • Reproducible testing framework
Potential Improvements
• Automated regression testing • Enhanced validation workflows • Integration with external expert systems
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
6.5x faster annotation process through structured testing
Cost Savings
Reduced expert review time through targeted validation
Quality Improvement
Higher accuracy through systematic prompt refinement
  1. Analytics Integration
  2. The research reveals hidden trends and correlations that require robust analytics tracking and monitoring
Implementation Details
1. Set up performance monitoring dashboards 2. Track classification accuracy metrics 3. Implement cost and usage analytics 4. Create correlation analysis tools
Key Benefits
• Real-time performance tracking • Cost optimization insights • Pattern detection capabilities
Potential Improvements
• Advanced correlation analysis • Automated insight generation • Custom metric development
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Faster identification of performance issues and trends
Cost Savings
Optimized resource allocation through usage analytics
Quality Improvement
Better understanding of classification accuracy and areas for improvement

The first platform built for prompt engineering