Published
Oct 18, 2024
Updated
Oct 18, 2024

Can AI Be Persuaded? Teaching Models to Resist and Accept

Teaching Models to Balance Resisting and Accepting Persuasion
By
Elias Stengel-Eskin|Peter Hase|Mohit Bansal

Summary

Imagine trying to convince a stubborn friend to change their mind. Frustrating, right? Now imagine that friend is an AI. That's the challenge researchers are tackling – how to build AI models that can be persuaded, but only when it's actually beneficial. Large language models (LLMs) are surprisingly susceptible to being swayed, even by obviously false information. This poses a serious problem, particularly when LLMs are used in situations requiring accurate, reliable information. However, simply making AI resistant to *all* persuasion isn't the answer either. After all, learning and improving involves accepting new information and revising beliefs. The ideal AI should be able to discern between helpful and harmful persuasion, accepting valid corrections while resisting manipulation. Researchers have developed a clever approach called Persuasion-Balanced Training (PBT) to address this. Using simulated conversations arranged in a tree-like structure, they created a training ground for AI. These dialogues present both positive (corrective) and negative (misleading) attempts at persuasion, allowing the AI to learn when to stand its ground and when to concede. The results? PBT significantly improves AI's resistance to misinformation and flip-flopping (changing answers under pressure). Even more impressively, PBT models become better team players in multi-agent debates, with stronger models effectively boosting weaker ones. The research also reveals *how* these improved AIs make decisions. It turns out they rely on the plausibility of their own answers and the proposed alternatives, essentially weighing the likelihood of each option. So, what does this all mean? PBT offers a crucial step towards building more robust and reliable AIs that can participate effectively in collaborative settings. By learning to balance resistance and acceptance, these models can enhance their knowledge and reasoning abilities while guarding against manipulation. This is a critical advancement as AIs increasingly become integrated into our lives, promising more fruitful human-AI interactions in the future.
🍰 Interesting in building your own agents?
PromptLayer provides the tools to manage and monitor prompts with your whole team. Get started for free.

Question & Answers

How does Persuasion-Balanced Training (PBT) technically work to improve AI decision-making?
PBT operates through simulated conversations structured in a tree-like format that presents both positive and negative persuasion attempts. The technical process involves: 1) Creating training dialogues with multiple branches representing different persuasion scenarios, 2) Exposing the AI to both valid corrections and misleading information, and 3) Training the model to evaluate response plausibility by weighing the likelihood of its current answer against proposed alternatives. For example, in a medical diagnosis scenario, the AI would learn to accept corrections backed by clinical evidence while rejecting unfounded alternative suggestions, even if presented persuasively.
What are the main benefits of AI systems that can learn from corrections?
AI systems that can learn from corrections offer several key advantages. They can adapt and improve over time, similar to how humans learn from mistakes and feedback. This capability makes them more reliable for real-world applications where accuracy is crucial, such as healthcare diagnostics or financial analysis. These systems can also work better with humans, as they can incorporate expert feedback while maintaining their core reliability. For instance, in customer service, such AIs can learn from customer interactions to provide better responses while resisting misleading or incorrect information.
How does AI resistance to misinformation benefit everyday users?
AI resistance to misinformation directly impacts the reliability of everyday AI interactions. When AI assistants can effectively distinguish between valid and misleading information, users receive more accurate and trustworthy responses for tasks like research, fact-checking, or decision-making support. This capability is particularly valuable in educational settings, news verification, and personal assistance applications. For example, when asking an AI for health advice, users can have greater confidence that the responses aren't easily swayed by unverified claims or misleading information.

PromptLayer Features

  1. Testing & Evaluation
  2. PBT's evaluation of model responses to different persuasion attempts aligns with systematic prompt testing needs
Implementation Details
Create test suites with varying persuasion scenarios, track model responses across versions, measure resistance/acceptance rates
Key Benefits
• Systematic evaluation of model behavior under different persuasion attempts • Quantifiable metrics for response consistency • Version-tracked improvement in persuasion handling
Potential Improvements
• Add specialized metrics for persuasion resistance • Implement automated persuasion attempt detection • Develop comparative analysis tools for different model versions
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Reduced time in identifying and fixing prompt vulnerabilities
Cost Savings
Lower risk of model manipulation in production systems
Quality Improvement
More consistent and reliable model responses
  1. Workflow Management
  2. Tree-structured dialogue simulations require sophisticated prompt orchestration and version tracking
Implementation Details
Design multi-step dialogue trees, track conversation paths, manage prompt variations
Key Benefits
• Structured management of complex dialogue scenarios • Reproducible conversation flows • Traceable persuasion training progress
Potential Improvements
• Add dialogue tree visualization tools • Implement automated conversation path generation • Create persuasion scenario templates
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Streamlined management of complex dialogue scenarios
Cost Savings
Reduced overhead in maintaining conversation flows
Quality Improvement
Better organization and reproducibility of training scenarios

The first platform built for prompt engineering