Published
May 31, 2024
Updated
May 31, 2024

The Curious Case of the Missing "That"

That's Optional: A Contemporary Exploration of "that" Omission in English Subordinate Clauses
By
Ella Rabinovich

Summary

Have you ever noticed how sometimes we drop the word "that" from our sentences, and yet they still make perfect sense? For example, we might say, "I think it's raining" instead of "I think *that* it's raining." This seemingly small omission is a fascinating puzzle for linguists, and a recent research paper, "That's Optional: A Contemporary Exploration of 'that' Omission in English Subordinate Clauses," dives deep into this phenomenon. The research explores the idea of 'Uniform Information Density' (UID), a theory suggesting that we structure our language to avoid overwhelming bursts of information. Essentially, we try to keep our sentences flowing smoothly, spreading the information evenly. The researchers analyzed a massive dataset of Reddit posts and comments, using powerful language models to understand how we decide when to keep or drop the "that." They found that the predictability of the words following the potential "that" plays a significant role. If the next word is highly predictable, we're more likely to omit "that." For instance, in the sentence "I know that you're right," the "you're" is quite predictable after "I know that," making the "that" feel a bit redundant. Interestingly, the overall uncertainty about how the sentence might continue also matters. If there are many possible ways the sentence could go, we tend to keep "that" to provide a bit more structure. This research sheds light on the subtle ways we shape our language for clarity and efficiency. While we may not consciously realize it, our brains are constantly working to optimize our communication, even down to the seemingly insignificant "that."
🍰 Interesting in building your own agents?
PromptLayer provides the tools to manage and monitor prompts with your whole team. Get started for free.

Question & Answers

How does the Uniform Information Density (UID) theory explain 'that' omission in linguistic analysis?
UID theory explains 'that' omission through information flow optimization. In technical terms, it suggests that speakers distribute information content evenly across utterances to maintain optimal processing efficiency. The process works through three key mechanisms: 1) Analyzing the predictability of subsequent words, 2) Evaluating overall sentence uncertainty, and 3) Balancing information density. For example, in 'I know (that) you're right,' the high predictability of 'you're' after 'I know' makes 'that' redundant from an information density perspective, leading to its optional omission while maintaining comprehensibility.
What role does predictability play in everyday language efficiency?
Predictability in language helps us communicate more efficiently by allowing us to streamline our speech naturally. When certain word combinations are highly predictable, we can often omit connecting words without losing meaning, making communication faster and more fluid. This natural optimization appears in casual conversations, business communications, and written text. For instance, we often say 'I think it's time' instead of 'I think that it's time' because our brains naturally recognize these patterns and help us maintain clarity while reducing unnecessary words.
How does understanding language patterns improve communication skills?
Understanding language patterns helps develop more effective communication by allowing us to adapt our speech for maximum clarity and efficiency. When we recognize how language naturally flows, we can make better choices about word usage and sentence structure. This knowledge can improve public speaking, writing, and everyday conversations. For example, knowing when to include or omit words like 'that' can make our speech more natural and engaging while ensuring our message remains clear and professional.

PromptLayer Features

  1. Testing & Evaluation
  2. The paper's analysis of predictability patterns in language can be applied to evaluate prompt effectiveness and response consistency
Implementation Details
Create test suites that measure response predictability and information density across different prompt variations
Key Benefits
• Quantitative measurement of prompt clarity and efficiency • Systematic evaluation of response consistency • Data-driven prompt optimization
Potential Improvements
• Add information density metrics to testing framework • Implement automated predictability scoring • Develop pattern recognition for optimal prompt structure
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
20-30% reduction in prompt iteration cycles through systematic testing
Cost Savings
Reduced token usage by identifying and eliminating redundant prompt elements
Quality Improvement
More consistent and predictable AI responses through optimized prompts
  1. Analytics Integration
  2. The research's analysis of language patterns and information density aligns with the need to monitor and optimize prompt performance
Implementation Details
Deploy analytics tools to track response patterns and information distribution in prompt-response pairs
Key Benefits
• Real-time monitoring of response quality • Pattern identification for optimal prompt structure • Data-driven optimization decisions
Potential Improvements
• Implement information density tracking • Add predictability scoring metrics • Develop automated prompt optimization suggestions
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
15-25% improvement in prompt effectiveness through data-driven optimization
Cost Savings
Reduced API costs through more efficient prompt structures
Quality Improvement
Enhanced response consistency and clarity through pattern analysis

The first platform built for prompt engineering