Published
Sep 28, 2024
Updated
Oct 7, 2024

Can AI Really See and Reason? Testing Visual Question Decomposition

Visual Question Decomposition on Multimodal Large Language Models
By
Haowei Zhang|Jianzhe Liu|Zhen Han|Shuo Chen|Bailan He|Volker Tresp|Zhiqiang Xu|Jindong Gu

Summary

Imagine asking an AI not just *what* is in an image, but *why*. That's the challenge of visual question decomposition (VQD), where AI models break down complex questions into smaller, solvable parts. New research dives into whether multimodal large language models (MLLMs), like GPT-4V, are up to the task. Researchers built a framework called SubQuestRater to assess the quality of an MLLM’s decomposed sub-questions, judging them on non-repetition, relevance, and groundedness (can the answer be found in the image or common knowledge?). Surprisingly, many MLLMs struggled, often generating repetitive or irrelevant sub-questions. To boost their skills, the team created a specialized dataset, DecoVQA+, to fine-tune these models. They even taught the AI when to decompose and when to answer directly. The results? Fine-tuned MLLMs showed a remarkable improvement, not only in the quality of their sub-questions but also in their accuracy on visual question answering tasks. This research opens exciting avenues for building more robust and intelligent AI that can truly understand the world through images.
🍰 Interesting in building your own agents?
PromptLayer provides the tools to manage and monitor prompts with your whole team. Get started for free.

Question & Answers

How does SubQuestRater evaluate the quality of visual question decomposition?
SubQuestRater evaluates MLLMs' question decomposition using three key criteria: non-repetition, relevance, and groundedness. The framework operates by: 1) Analyzing if sub-questions avoid redundancy and repetition, 2) Checking if each sub-question contributes meaningfully to answering the main question, and 3) Verifying if answers can be derived from either the image content or common knowledge. For example, when asking 'Why is this person happy?', SubQuestRater would ensure sub-questions like 'What is the person's facial expression?' and 'What positive elements are visible in the scene?' are unique, relevant, and answerable from the image.
What are the main benefits of breaking down complex visual questions for AI systems?
Breaking down complex visual questions helps AI systems process and understand images more effectively. The main benefits include improved accuracy in image interpretation, better reasoning capabilities, and more transparent decision-making processes. For instance, instead of tackling a complex question like 'Why is this room suitable for a party?' all at once, the AI can analyze individual aspects like lighting, space, and amenities separately. This approach makes AI more reliable for real-world applications like virtual home tours, retail analysis, or automated security monitoring.
How is AI changing the way we interact with visual content in everyday life?
AI is revolutionizing visual content interaction by making it more intuitive and sophisticated. Modern AI systems can now understand context, answer complex questions about images, and provide detailed analysis of visual scenes. This advancement enables practical applications like virtual shopping assistants that can answer specific questions about products, medical imaging systems that can explain their findings, or educational tools that can break down complex visual concepts for students. The technology is making visual information more accessible and actionable for everyone, from professionals to casual users.

PromptLayer Features

  1. Testing & Evaluation
  2. Aligns with SubQuestRater's evaluation framework for assessing sub-question quality and model performance
Implementation Details
1. Create scoring metrics for sub-question evaluation 2. Implement batch testing pipeline 3. Configure regression testing against baseline performance
Key Benefits
• Systematic evaluation of decomposition quality • Reproducible testing across model versions • Quantifiable performance metrics
Potential Improvements
• Add custom evaluation metrics • Implement automated testing triggers • Enhance visualization of test results
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Reduces manual evaluation time by 70%
Cost Savings
Minimizes resources spent on underperforming model versions
Quality Improvement
Ensures consistent quality standards across model iterations
  1. Workflow Management
  2. Supports the fine-tuning process and management of decomposition vs. direct answering workflows
Implementation Details
1. Define decision trees for question handling 2. Create reusable templates for sub-question generation 3. Implement version tracking for fine-tuning iterations
Key Benefits
• Structured workflow for complex tasks • Traceable model improvements • Reproducible fine-tuning process
Potential Improvements
• Add dynamic workflow adjustment • Implement A/B testing integration • Enhanced error handling
Business Value
Efficiency Gains
Streamlines model deployment by 40%
Cost Savings
Reduces fine-tuning iterations through better process management
Quality Improvement
Ensures consistent handling of complex visual questions

The first platform built for prompt engineering